[GSBN] Can bale buildings be air tight?- How to ventilate discussion

Chris Magwood chris at endeavourcentre.org
Thu Mar 21 21:54:26 UTC 2013


The new book The Natural Building Companion is an excellent resource. 
Contains great building science but puts it forward in a way that 
newcomers can comprehend.

Chris

On 13-03-21 5:31 PM, PennElys Droz wrote:
> Hey all!  Ive been loving this ventilation discussion  - thank you all 
> very much...notes taken, and will continue to be taken!
>
> On another thread, Im developing a sustainable construction weeklong 
> hands on intensive for Native professionals and tribes.  Any ideas on 
> text that would be comprehensive, yet cover basics?  Im looking at Dan 
> Chiras' The New Ecological Home.  What else?   We are developing our 
> own specific curriculum, but want to purchase texts for the participants.
>
> Thanks!
> PennElys Droz, Sustainable Nations
> www.sustainablenations.org <http://www.sustainablenations.org>
> pennelys at sustainablenations.org <mailto:pennelys at sustainablenations.org>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:14 AM, John Straube <jfstraube at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jfstraube at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     The problem with airflow windows, which have been around for 30
>     years or more, is that the heat recovery is only as efficient as
>     an HRV during sunny hours.  On a 24 hour basis in winter, the heat
>     recovery (defined as the ratio of the energy content of the
>     incoming temperature and outgoing air, which is leaking out
>     somewhere) is not as good as a good HRV and a triple glazed
>     window.  If you couple these with an heat pump to extract heat
>     from the air you exhaust, these systems can be equal or better
>     than a good HRV.
>     Of course, you need one such window  in every room to get the air
>     to each room.
>     A good HRV with good TG windows seems a lot cheaper and a lot
>     simpler...
>     On 2013-03-12, at 8:40 AM, Caroline Meyer White
>     <hojtpaastraa at gmail.com <mailto:hojtpaastraa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > Hi there on the other side of the pond. (Is that a general North
>     American expression, or just my grandmother?)
>     >
>     > In Denmark, a company is selling a "ventilation window". I
>     attached their flyer, it has some drawings, though in Danish) It
>     is developed from an old Russian type of window, where you have
>     two glass panes with space in between - like 3-4 inches. The
>     interior pane is a well insulated double pane, and I believe that
>     the exterior is only a single layer pane. The frame is engineered,
>     both being a very high quality wood for windows, but also with
>     detailing breaking thermal bridges. Now the secret about it, (not
>     kept) is a vent with a phase changing (I believe oil substance) at
>     the top and bottom. These vents do not have any energy supply, but
>     allow air to flow in between the panes FROM the out side, entering
>     at the bottom, when heat is required in the building. The air is
>     pre-heated between the panes and reach a temperature of average 10
>     Celsius above what it was before it entered - heated by the sun
>     hitting the outer pane and the heat loss going through the inner pane.
>     > In summer the flow goes the other way, and the window helps cool
>     down the building. The Technical University of Denmark has made
>     some calculations determining that a window of the standard size
>     (around 1,2 m2) on average of the four corners of the compass,
>     contributes with 425 kWh / year - that is the heat gain, then
>     comes the ventilation supply besides that.
>     >
>     > We do not have air tightness tests on SB buildings in Denmark
>     yet. But this summer we are building a large residential home with
>     these windows and I am very eager to see, if they will be
>     sufficient to take care of the ventilation demand, as I don't know
>     the air stream I haven't been able to calculate it.
>     >
>     > Cheers
>     > Caroline
>     >
>     >
>     > 2013/3/11 Anthony Novelli <anthony.novelli at gmail.com
>     <mailto:anthony.novelli at gmail.com>>
>     > Thanks Chris and August...
>     >
>     > August, you bring up a point that might help me clarify my
>     question... I would assume in cold climate situations that very
>     little humidity would be required to develop condensation on
>     exterior glass, unless employing some super efficient triple pane
>     with thermal breaks. Either way those surfaces will be much colder
>     than an earthen plaster or wood that spreads and holds warmth.
>     Part of what I'm considering is not how to eliminate the
>     condensation, but rather what to do with it while it's there? Is
>     there a window sill detail for the interior that could accommodate
>     the inevitable moisture present? Perhaps these are already
>     employed and I'm out of the loop... just seen a lot of attention
>     on moisture on the outside of windows more than inside. Even with
>     excellent venting it seems a good passive fail-safe.
>     >
>     > Best,T
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > Message: 1
>     > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:00:58 -0600
>     > From: August Hasz <hasz at reginc.com <mailto:hasz at reginc.com>>
>     > To: Global Straw Building Network <GSBN at sustainablesources.com
>     <mailto:GSBN at sustainablesources.com>>
>     > Subject: Re: [GSBN] Can bale buildings be air tight?- How to
>     ventilate
>     >         discussion
>     > Message-ID: <EB70F934-A014-47AA-9BE4-03F8E2FF2884 at reginc.com
>     <mailto:EB70F934-A014-47AA-9BE4-03F8E2FF2884 at reginc.com>>
>     > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>     >
>     > All-
>     >
>     > First my bias: we engineer mechanical and structural systems for
>     buildings. So it goes without saying see better results from
>     adding a level of control and predictability. With that bias comes
>     a lot of experience looking at under ventilated homes. The
>     discussion about building and occupant related pollutants is a big
>     factor, but misses another crucial component- condensation due to
>     moisture. The building envelope may be permeable enough to
>     survive, but in cold climates condensation on windows is
>     unavoidable without controlling moisture in the home. In cold
>     climates what we see time and time again for a remotely tight home
>     (homes with 2 or 3 times the air leakage we are talking about
>     here) is significant condensation build-up resulting in damaged
>     materials and mold growth on surfaces. This primarily at windows
>     due to the cold temps, but if there is any other location were the
>     insulation detail isn't right problems will happen there as well.
>     >
>     > We have had a number clients/friends decide to skip the
>     ventilation system over the years, and every time what ends up
>     happening is they are either forced to run bathroom fans
>     continuously in the winter (heat loss) or find a way to retrofit
>     an HRV or ERV in. That applies to standard construction, bales,
>     anything you build that is somewhat well sealed. We all know
>     retrofits are expensive and to be avoided, so why leave it to chance?
>     >
>     > This probably is not too much of a surprise in the
>     high-mountains of Crested Butte, Colorado, I assume the effect is
>     worse in Chris' backyard. I was however surprised to see it is a
>     big problem even in Moab. Moab is where we go to thaw our bones
>     out in the middle of winter, it isn't cold right? We have been
>     involved in the Community Rebuilds project happening there (If you
>     aren't familiar, make sure and check out what Emily Niehaus has
>     started over there, we are now starting one in our valley as well)
>     and 3 homes had significant condensation on windows this winter
>     resulting in a mold problem and damaged finishes. The result is
>     that all future CR homes will have HRV's.
>     >
>     > From my perspective there is no debate: build it tight, and
>     ventilate right. Relaxing the tightness of the home just leaves it
>     up to chance- did I make it leaky enough for the building envelope
>     to dry? enough to get the moisture out of the air? enough to get
>     the result of cooking (gas combustion and lots of other
>     pollutants)? It isn't' worth the risk to building occupants or to
>     the building. Do we want to have a realization 10 years from now
>     about health problems from a homes that seemed leaky enough, but
>     oops not quite? Daily life makes pollutants, even if we are all
>     watching everything we do (breathing, showering, cooking). So now
>     I have a choice of how to ventilate: crack a window? exhaust fan?
>     or HRV/ERV? Only the heat/energy recovery ventilator allows for
>     exchanging air efficiently. The others are fighting against all
>     the great work you put into the building envelope.
>     >
>     > My 5 cents-
>     >
>     > August
>     >
>     > _________________________
>     >
>     >
>     > August Hasz, PE, Principal
>     > LEED AP
>     > Resource Engineering Group, Inc.
>     > Mail: Box 3725
>     > Delivery: 502 Whiterock Ave., Suite 102
>     > Crested Butte, CO 81224 USA
>     > Tel: 970-349-1216
>     > hasz at reginc.com <mailto:hasz at reginc.com>
>     > www.reginc.com <http://www.reginc.com>
>     > _________________________
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > GSBN mailing list
>     > GSBN at sustainablesources.com <mailto:GSBN at sustainablesources.com>
>     > http://sustainablesources.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/GSBN
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Caroline, Tahir, Noah
>     >
>     > Friland 11, 8410 Rønde, Denmark, tlf. (+45) 40 76 19 80
>     <tel:%28%2B45%29%2040%2076%2019%2080>, skypename: caroline.meyer.white
>     >
>     > <Horn ventilations vindue
>     katalog.pdf>_______________________________________________
>     > GSBN mailing list
>     > GSBN at sustainablesources.com <mailto:GSBN at sustainablesources.com>
>     > http://sustainablesources.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/GSBN
>
>     John Straube
>     www.JohnStraube.com <http://www.JohnStraube.com>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     GSBN mailing list
>     GSBN at sustainablesources.com <mailto:GSBN at sustainablesources.com>
>     http://sustainablesources.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/GSBN
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> PennElys Droz, M.S. Director
>
> Sustainable Nations
> PO Box 3745
> Tucson, AZ  85722
> www.sustainablenations.org <http://www.sustainablenations.org>
>
> /"If you have come to help me, you are wasting your time. But if you 
> have come because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us 
> work together."      Lila Watson/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GSBN mailing list
> GSBN at sustainablesources.com
> http://sustainablesources.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/GSBN

-- 
Chris Magwood
Director, Endeavour Centre
www.endeavourcentre.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sustainablesources.com/pipermail/gsbn/attachments/20130321/47679686/attachment.htm>


More information about the GSBN mailing list